Additional Info: I wrote a Python script using Astropy to calculate the distance between the named planets on the first day of each month for every year.
Report an error
The distance between Uranus and Jupiter correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of credit counselors in Massachusetts | r=0.95 | 13yrs | No |
Average number of comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos | r=0.92 | 15yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Romania | r=0.91 | 13yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Angola | r=0.9 | 12yrs | No |
The number of MRI technicians in Connecticut | r=0.88 | 11yrs | No |
Google searches for 'unicorns' | r=0.87 | 20yrs | No |
Number of Samsung Electronics Employees Worldwide | r=0.85 | 14yrs | No |
Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" | r=0.74 | 12yrs | No |
Votes for Republican Senators in Missouri | r=0.69 | 16yrs | No |
Hydopower energy generated in United States | r=-0.51 | 42yrs | No |
Vale S.A.'s stock price (VALE) | r=-0.76 | 21yrs | No |
The number of hotel managers in District of Columbia | r=-0.82 | 20yrs | No |
The distance between Uranus and Jupiter also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)