Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
Ulta Beauty's stock price (ULTA) correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Google searches for 'do i need to go to the doctor' | r=0.98 | 16yrs | No |
Gender pay gap in the U.S. | r=0.98 | 14yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on poultry | r=0.96 | 15yrs | Yes! |
The number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in Georgia | r=0.94 | 15yrs | No |
Motor vehicle thefts in Oregon | r=0.94 | 15yrs | No |
Butter consumption | r=0.92 | 14yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'how to treat internal bleeding' | r=0.91 | 16yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in Engineering technologies | r=0.86 | 10yrs | No |
Air quality in Los Angeles | r=0.73 | 16yrs | No |
Ulta Beauty's stock price (ULTA) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)