Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
Trip.com Group's stock price (TCOM) correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Gasoline pumped in Benin | r=0.95 | 18yrs | No |
The number of network systems administrators in New Hampshire | r=0.94 | 17yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Adeline | r=0.93 | 19yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Killian | r=0.92 | 19yrs | Yes! |
Fossil fuel use in Bolivia | r=0.92 | 18yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Myra | r=0.91 | 19yrs | No |
Italian-type cheese consumption | r=0.9 | 18yrs | No |
How nerdy MinuteEarth YouTube video titles are | r=0.88 | 11yrs | Yes! |
US production of cheese (other than cottage cheese) | r=0.88 | 18yrs | No |
The distance between Saturn and Mercury | r=0.87 | 20yrs | Yes! |
GMO use in corn | r=0.83 | 20yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'who is donald trump' | r=0.72 | 20yrs | No |
Trip.com Group's stock price (TCOM) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)