Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
Dollar General's stock price (DG) correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Nico | r=0.99 | 13yrs | No |
The number of political scientists in Washington | r=0.97 | 13yrs | No |
Google searches for 'dr pepper vs mr pibb' | r=0.87 | 14yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Rafael | r=0.85 | 13yrs | No |
The number of movies Ben Affleck appeared in | r=0.54 | 14yrs | No |
Air pollution in Rapid City, South Dakota | r=0.51 | 14yrs | No |
Dollar General's stock price (DG) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)