Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
American Water Works Company's stock price (AWK) correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies | r=1 | 10yrs | No |
| Annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables | r=0.99 | 14yrs | No |
| Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs | r=0.99 | 14yrs | No |
| Average views of MrBeast's YouTube videos | r=0.97 | 12yrs | No |
| Hispanic cheese consumption | r=0.96 | 13yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'dr pepper vs mr pibb' | r=0.87 | 15yrs | No |
American Water Works Company's stock price (AWK) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)