Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
United Rentals' stock price (URI) correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of transportation, storage, and distribution managers in California | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
Sales of LP/Vinyl Albums | r=0.97 | 21yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Ruth | r=0.96 | 21yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'cold shower' | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Sage | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
Wind power generated in China | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on home maintenance | r=0.95 | 21yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs | r=0.95 | 21yrs | Yes! |
American cheese consumption | r=0.93 | 20yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on fish and seafood | r=0.93 | 21yrs | Yes! |
Total views on Steve Mould's YouTube videos | r=0.9 | 15yrs | No |
United Rentals' stock price (URI) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)