Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
Kroger's stock price (KR) correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of veterinary assistants in Tennessee | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
Air quality in Chicago | r=0.92 | 22yrs | Yes! |
The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota | r=0.9 | 16yrs | Yes! |
US Bottled Water Consumption per Person | r=0.88 | 21yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'cold shower' | r=0.88 | 20yrs | No |
The number of Breweries in the United States | r=0.88 | 21yrs | Yes! |
Kroger's stock price (KR) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)