Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
Electronic Arts' stock price (EA) correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Master's degrees awarded in Parks & Recreation | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
| The number of computer network architects in New York | r=0.97 | 11yrs | No |
| The number of first-line supervisors of police and detectives in Kansas | r=0.96 | 13yrs | No |
| Annual US household spending on household furnishings and equipment | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
| Bachelor's degrees awarded in biomedical sciences | r=0.96 | 10yrs | No |
| Associates degrees awarded in Psychology | r=0.95 | 11yrs | No |
| Associates degrees awarded in literature | r=0.95 | 11yrs | No |
| How clickbait-y CGP Grey YouTube video titles are | r=0.92 | 13yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Sage | r=0.92 | 21yrs | No |
| Cheddar cheese consumption | r=0.9 | 20yrs | No |
Electronic Arts' stock price (EA) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)