Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
ST Microelectronics' stock price (STM) correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Average views of MrBeast's YouTube videos | r=0.96 | 12yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies | r=0.96 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Powerball lottery numbers | r=0.9 | 13yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'spiderman pointing' meme | r=0.87 | 18yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in Architecture | r=-0.96 | 10yrs | No |
ST Microelectronics' stock price (STM) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)