Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
PG&E's stock price (PCG) correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Average length of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos | r=0.98 | 9yrs | No |
Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs | r=0.9 | 10yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Germany | r=0.84 | 20yrs | No |
Number of public school students in 2nd grade | r=0.81 | 21yrs | No |
Jet fuel used in Turkmenistan | r=0.79 | 20yrs | No |
Google searches for 'Mr. Beast' | r=-0.83 | 20yrs | No |
PG&E's stock price (PCG) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)