Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
Baidu's stock price (BIDU) correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 | r=0.97 | 12yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Tanzania | r=0.95 | 16yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Nolan | r=0.95 | 17yrs | No |
Number of internet users | r=0.94 | 11yrs | No |
Petroluem consumption in Russia | r=0.94 | 16yrs | No |
The distance between Saturn and the moon | r=0.91 | 18yrs | No |
The distance between Saturn and Earth | r=0.91 | 18yrs | Yes! |
The distance between Saturn and the Sun | r=0.91 | 18yrs | Yes! |
Muenster cheese consumption | r=0.91 | 16yrs | No |
US household spending on rented dwellings | r=0.88 | 17yrs | Yes! |
US dairy skim solids used to produce whey products | r=0.87 | 16yrs | No |
Average views of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos | r=0.73 | 17yrs | No |
Baidu's stock price (BIDU) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)