Report an error
Adidas Group's Global Net Sales correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Total Revenue of the NFL Teams | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
Number of internet users | r=0.98 | 17yrs | No |
The distance between Neptune and Uranus | r=0.97 | 23yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on healthcare | r=0.97 | 23yrs | No |
Muenster cheese consumption | r=0.97 | 22yrs | No |
Mozzarella cheese consumption | r=0.97 | 22yrs | No |
Number of Lawyers in the United States | r=0.97 | 23yrs | No |
GMO use in cotton | r=0.96 | 23yrs | No |
Cognizant Technology Solutions' stock price (CTSH) | r=0.95 | 21yrs | No |
The distance between Saturn and Earth | r=0.94 | 23yrs | No |
The distance between Saturn and the Sun | r=0.94 | 23yrs | No |
The number of fashion designers in California | r=0.93 | 20yrs | No |
Air quality in Grand Rapids, Michigan | r=0.79 | 23yrs | No |
Adidas Group's Global Net Sales also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)