Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
Roper Technologies' stock price (ROP) correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Google's Annual Global Revenue | r=1 | 21yrs | No |
| Annual US household spending on home maintenance | r=0.99 | 21yrs | No |
| Biomass power generated in Turkiye | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Theodore | r=0.98 | 21yrs | No |
| Electricity generation in Angola | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
| The number of Breweries in the United States | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
| American-type cheese consumption | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
| American cheese consumption | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
| Gender pay gap in the U.S. | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
Roper Technologies' stock price (ROP) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)