Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
Itaú Unibanco Holding's stock price (ITUB) correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Total likes of OverSimplified YouTube videos | r=0.96 | 7yrs | No |
Total views on OverSimplified YouTube videos | r=0.92 | 7yrs | No |
The number of network systems administrators in Alabama | r=0.9 | 18yrs | Yes! |
Hydopower energy generated in Brazil | r=0.87 | 19yrs | No |
Votes for Republican Senators in Tennessee | r=0.78 | 6yrs | No |
Air pollution in Vernal, Utah | r=0.76 | 21yrs | Yes! |
Itaú Unibanco Holding's stock price (ITUB) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)