Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
General Dynamics' stock price (GD) correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of electricians in South Dakota | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
Restaurant spending in New Mexico | r=0.96 | 19yrs | No |
The number of consultants in California | r=0.95 | 20yrs | No |
Total NBA League Revenue | r=0.95 | 21yrs | No |
Restaurant spending in Connecticut | r=0.95 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Hazel | r=0.95 | 21yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'this is fine' meme | r=0.93 | 18yrs | No |
Gender pay gap in the U.S. | r=0.93 | 20yrs | No |
The distance between Neptune and Uranus | r=0.92 | 22yrs | No |
General Dynamics' stock price (GD) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)