Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
Colgate-Palmolive Company's stock price (CL) correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Dean | r=0.97 | 21yrs | No |
The number of physical therapists in North Carolina | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Esther | r=0.97 | 21yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on rented dwellings | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in India | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on healthcare | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
The distance between Neptune and Uranus | r=0.96 | 22yrs | No |
Google searches for 'tummy ache' | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on fresh fruits | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
U.S. direct investment abroad | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
US Wind Power Generation Capacity | r=0.95 | 21yrs | No |
USA Population | r=0.95 | 21yrs | No |
GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska | r=0.94 | 22yrs | No |
Mozzarella cheese consumption | r=0.91 | 20yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Simone | r=-0.91 | 21yrs | No |
Colgate-Palmolive Company's stock price (CL) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)