Report an error
Total Points Earned by Barracuda Golf Championship Winner correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of building inspectors in Guam | r=0.95 | 6yrs | No |
Snowfall in Minneapolis | r=0.85 | 8yrs | No |
Air quality in San Antonio, Texas | r=0.81 | 13yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'how to annex texas' | r=0.77 | 8yrs | Yes! |
Total Points Earned by Barracuda Golf Championship Winner also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)