Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
FedEx's stock price (FDX) correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of motorcycle mechanics in Maine | r=0.91 | 20yrs | Yes! |
US per-person consumption of bottled water | r=0.9 | 21yrs | Yes! |
Restaurant spending in Missouri | r=0.9 | 19yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on alcoholic beverages | r=0.89 | 21yrs | No |
American cheese consumption | r=0.88 | 20yrs | Yes! |
The distance between Neptune and Uranus | r=0.85 | 22yrs | No |
How provocative AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are | r=0.83 | 12yrs | Yes! |
FedEx's stock price (FDX) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)