Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
Activision Blizzard's stock price (ATVI) correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
US edible fishery product imports | r=0.98 | 12yrs | No |
Biomass power generated in South Korea | r=0.98 | 12yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in Parks & Recreation | r=0.96 | 10yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on major appliances | r=0.96 | 13yrs | No |
Renewable energy production in South Africa | r=0.96 | 12yrs | No |
Google searches for 'sushi near me' | r=0.96 | 13yrs | No |
Solar power generated in China | r=0.96 | 12yrs | No |
US milk fat used to produce sour cream | r=0.93 | 12yrs | No |
US per-person consumption of bottled water | r=0.93 | 13yrs | Yes! |
The number of Breweries in the United States | r=0.92 | 13yrs | No |
Number of public school students in 12th grade | r=0.92 | 13yrs | Yes! |
The number of food scientists and technologists in Kansas | r=0.84 | 13yrs | Yes! |
The number of movies Henry Cavill appeared in | r=0.76 | 13yrs | No |
Activision Blizzard's stock price (ATVI) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)