Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
Equinix's stock price (EQIX) correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to learn python' | r=0.96 | 17yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs | r=0.96 | 20yrs | Yes! |
The number of Breweries in the United States | r=0.95 | 20yrs | Yes! |
US Bottled Water Consumption per Person | r=0.92 | 20yrs | Yes! |
Butter consumption | r=0.91 | 19yrs | Yes! |
Equinix's stock price (EQIX) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)