Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
British American Tobacco p.l.c.'s stock price (BTI) correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for Libertarian Senators in North Carolina | r=0.97 | 7yrs | No |
Number of internet users | r=0.96 | 15yrs | No |
Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Saint Lucia | r=0.9 | 20yrs | No |
Renewable energy production in Congo-Brazzaville | r=0.87 | 20yrs | No |
The number of pipelayers in North Dakota | r=0.85 | 20yrs | Yes! |
The number of movies Bradley Cooper appeared in | r=0.66 | 22yrs | No |
British American Tobacco p.l.c.'s stock price (BTI) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)