Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
Becton, Dickinson and Company's stock price (BDX) correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Associates degrees awarded in Mathematics and statistics | r=0.99 | 11yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Ada | r=0.99 | 21yrs | No |
How insightful MrBeast's YouTube video titles are | r=0.86 | 12yrs | No |
Academy Award Best Actor Winner's Age | r=0.49 | 21yrs | No |
Becton, Dickinson and Company's stock price (BDX) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)