Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
Altria Group's stock price (MO) correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Amazon's shipping revenue in millions of dollars | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
Restaurant spending in Delaware | r=0.97 | 19yrs | No |
Number of websites on the internet | r=0.97 | 17yrs | No |
Google searches for 'cat memes' | r=0.94 | 20yrs | Yes! |
The distance between Saturn and Earth | r=0.91 | 22yrs | No |
The distance between Saturn and the Sun | r=0.9 | 22yrs | No |
Altria Group's stock price (MO) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)