Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
Micron Technology's stock price (MU) correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Google searches for 'elon musk' | r=0.96 | 14yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Teddy | r=0.95 | 21yrs | No |
The number of interior designers in Arkansas | r=0.94 | 20yrs | No |
Google's Net Income | r=0.94 | 19yrs | No |
Google searches for 'who is elon musk' | r=0.94 | 19yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Walker | r=0.93 | 21yrs | No |
Sales of LP/Vinyl Albums | r=0.92 | 21yrs | Yes! |
xkcd comics published about research | r=0.84 | 17yrs | Yes! |
The number of Breweries in the United States | r=0.82 | 21yrs | Yes! |
Micron Technology's stock price (MU) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)