Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
Anheuser-Busch InBev's stock price (BUD) correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of dining room and cafeteria attendants in South Dakota | r=0.95 | 13yrs | No |
Motor vehicle thefts in Idaho | r=0.93 | 13yrs | No |
The number of university fitness studies teachers in Iowa | r=0.92 | 13yrs | No |
The distance between Jupiter and Mercury | r=0.92 | 14yrs | Yes! |
The distance between Jupiter and the moon | r=0.91 | 14yrs | No |
The distance between Jupiter and Earth | r=0.91 | 14yrs | Yes! |
The number of upholsterers in Missouri | r=0.9 | 13yrs | No |
The distance between Jupiter and Venus | r=0.86 | 14yrs | Yes! |
The number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in Georgia | r=0.85 | 13yrs | Yes! |
The number of crane operators in Illinois | r=0.77 | 13yrs | No |
Anheuser-Busch InBev's stock price (BUD) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)