Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
Deere & Company's stock price (DE) correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Maeve | r=0.97 | 21yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on bakery products | r=0.97 | 21yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Niko | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
Google searches for 'when is new years' | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
The number of marriage therapists in Utah | r=0.95 | 20yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on cereals and bakery products | r=0.95 | 21yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs | r=0.95 | 21yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Ghana | r=0.93 | 20yrs | No |
Butter consumption | r=0.9 | 20yrs | Yes! |
Academy Award Best Supporting Actress Winner Age | r=0.84 | 20yrs | Yes! |
Deere & Company's stock price (DE) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)