Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
Conoco Phillips' stock price (COP) correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for Democratic Senators in Arizona | r=0.96 | 7yrs | Yes! |
US hotel industry's revenue per available room | r=0.94 | 13yrs | No |
Grocery store spend in Oregon | r=0.89 | 19yrs | No |
The number of counter and rental clerks in Wyoming | r=0.89 | 20yrs | Yes! |
Conoco Phillips' stock price (COP) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)