Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
Philip Morris International's stock price (PM) correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Number of Public Library Members in the UK | r=0.99 | 6yrs | No |
The number of librarians in South Dakota | r=0.96 | 10yrs | No |
Air quality in Georgetown, South Carolina | r=0.88 | 10yrs | No |
Air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina | r=0.88 | 6yrs | No |
US dairy skim solids used to produce yogurt, nonfrozen | r=0.85 | 13yrs | No |
Air pollution in El Centro, California | r=0.77 | 15yrs | No |
Philip Morris International's stock price (PM) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)