Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
SAP SE's stock price (SAP) correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of industrial engineers in Wisconsin | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Rosie | r=0.97 | 21yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Ivy | r=0.97 | 21yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Sudan | r=0.96 | 13yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in linguistics | r=0.95 | 11yrs | No |
US per-person consumption of bottled water | r=0.95 | 21yrs | No |
The number of Breweries in the United States | r=0.95 | 21yrs | No |
The distance between Neptune and Uranus | r=0.93 | 22yrs | Yes! |
Butter consumption | r=0.92 | 20yrs | No |
Mozzarella cheese consumption | r=0.91 | 20yrs | No |
Google searches for 'i am dizzy' | r=0.91 | 20yrs | No |
SAP SE's stock price (SAP) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)