Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
Salesforce's stock price (CRM) correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Sunny | r=0.99 | 18yrs | Yes! |
Solar power generated in Australia | r=0.98 | 17yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Biological sciences | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on nonalcoholic beverages | r=0.98 | 18yrs | No |
Wind power generated in Jordan | r=0.97 | 17yrs | No |
Hispanic cheese consumption | r=0.95 | 17yrs | No |
The number of Breweries in the United States | r=0.93 | 18yrs | Yes! |
Butter consumption | r=0.92 | 17yrs | Yes! |
Salesforce's stock price (CRM) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)