Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
Cisco Systems' stock price (CSCO) correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Associates degrees awarded in Fine and studio arts | r=0.99 | 11yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Mathematics and statistics | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
The number of human resources specialists in Iowa | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Lebanon | r=0.98 | 12yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in History | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Namibia | r=0.97 | 12yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Yemen | r=0.97 | 12yrs | No |
The number of transportation workers in Utah | r=0.95 | 20yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on home maintenance | r=0.95 | 21yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Ruth | r=0.94 | 21yrs | No |
Cisco Systems' stock price (CSCO) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)