Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
Adobe's stock price (ADBE) correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Popularity of the first name Stevie | r=1 | 21yrs | No |
| Solar power generated in Sweden | r=0.99 | 20yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Maeve | r=0.99 | 21yrs | No |
| Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies | r=0.99 | 10yrs | Yes! |
| Popularity of the first name Sonny | r=0.99 | 21yrs | No |
| Popularity of the 'wojak' meme | r=0.97 | 18yrs | No |
| Average views of MrBeast's YouTube videos | r=0.97 | 12yrs | No |
| Average views of Steve Mould's YouTube videos | r=0.96 | 15yrs | No |
| Google's Annual Global Revenue | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
| Annual US household spending on fish and seafood | r=0.95 | 21yrs | No |
| Annual US household spending on housing | r=0.87 | 21yrs | No |
Adobe's stock price (ADBE) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)