Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
Berkshire Hathaway's stock price (BRK.A) correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Theodore | r=0.98 | 21yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Mathematics and statistics | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
Gender pay gap in the U.S. | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
The number of Breweries in the United States | r=0.97 | 21yrs | No |
Microsoft's Worldwide Earnings | r=0.97 | 21yrs | No |
Hydopower energy generated in Peru | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in Mathematics and statistics | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
Google searches for 'best colleges' | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
Berkshire Hathaway's stock price (BRK.A) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)