Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
Tesla's stock price (TSLA) correlates with...
Tesla's stock price (TSLA) also correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Sys. Score |
Number of public school students in 9th grade | r=0.88 | 12yrs | 303 |
Grocery store spend in Massachusetts | r=0.96 | 10yrs | 298 |
Grocery store spend in Michigan | r=0.96 | 10yrs | 288 |
Solar power generated in Mozambique | r=0.94 | 10yrs | 288 |
Grocery store spend in Missouri | r=0.96 | 10yrs | 278 |
Solar power generated in Albania | r=0.91 | 11yrs | 265 |
The number of layout workers, metal and plastic in Virginia | r=0.98 | 12yrs | 255 |
The number of industrial truck and tractor operators in Alabama | r=0.97 | 12yrs | 244 |
The number of purchasing managers in Arkansas | r=0.97 | 12yrs | 224 |
The number of court and municipal clerks in Arkansas | r=0.97 | 12yrs | 214 |
The number of urban planners in Delaware | r=0.97 | 12yrs | 204 |
Food spending in North Carolina | r=0.95 | 10yrs | 197 |
The number of public relations specialists in Florida | r=0.97 | 12yrs | 194 |
Food spending in South Carolina | r=0.95 | 10yrs | 187 |
Grocery store spend in Connecticut | r=0.95 | 10yrs | 177 |
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)