Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
Report an error
Google searches for 'takeout near me' correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Solar power generated in Cambodia | r=0.98 | 17yrs | Yes! |
Biomass power generated in Ukraine | r=0.98 | 13yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'wojak' meme | r=0.97 | 18yrs | Yes! |
The marriage rate in Montana | r=0.96 | 17yrs | No |
Total length of Mark Rober YouTube videos | r=0.95 | 13yrs | No |
The number of statisticians in Vermont | r=0.94 | 18yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on beef | r=0.93 | 18yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'spiderman pointing' meme | r=0.93 | 18yrs | No |
Sales of LP/Vinyl Albums | r=0.92 | 18yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'i am once again' meme | r=0.9 | 18yrs | Yes! |
The number of fast food cooks in Kentucky | r=0.75 | 18yrs | No |
The number of movies Denzel Washington appeared in | r=0.63 | 19yrs | No |
Academy Award Best Actor Winner's Age | r=0.57 | 18yrs | No |
Google searches for 'takeout near me' also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)