Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
Report an error
Google searches for 'delorean' correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Total number of passenger vehicles sold in China | r=0.91 | 7yrs | No |
How good Computerphile YouTube video titles are | r=0.63 | 11yrs | No |
Shark attacks in the United States | r=0.63 | 19yrs | No |
The number of movies Brad Pitt appeared in | r=0.45 | 20yrs | No |
Google searches for 'delorean' also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)