Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
Report an error
Google searches for 'mortgage rates' correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for Democratic Senators in New Mexico | r=0.93 | 6yrs | No |
The number of librarians in Arizona | r=0.85 | 15yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'rickroll' meme | r=0.66 | 18yrs | No |
China's Unemployment Rate | r=0.65 | 19yrs | No |
Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" | r=-0.93 | 12yrs | No |
Google searches for 'mortgage rates' also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)