Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
Report an error
Google searches for 'shrek' correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for Republican Senators in Idaho | r=0.97 | 6yrs | No |
Average length of Technology Connections YouTube videos | r=0.97 | 9yrs | No |
Votes for Republican Senators in Arizona | r=0.97 | 7yrs | No |
The average number of likes on MrBeast's YouTube videos | r=0.96 | 12yrs | No |
The number of judicial law clerks in Missouri | r=0.93 | 12yrs | No |
Average views of MrBeast's YouTube videos | r=0.92 | 12yrs | No |
How clickbait-y Tom Scott's YouTube video titles are | r=0.92 | 15yrs | Yes! |
The number of school teachers in Arizona | r=0.92 | 13yrs | No |
The number of human resources specialists in Arizona | r=0.91 | 11yrs | No |
Votes for Democratic Senators in Nevada | r=0.9 | 6yrs | Yes! |
Master's degrees awarded in Business | r=0.87 | 10yrs | No |
Air pollution in Claremont, New Hampshire | r=0.83 | 18yrs | Yes! |
Deepest snow depth in Charlotte | r=0.82 | 12yrs | No |
Number of edits to the Wikipedia article for Thanksgiving | r=0.78 | 16yrs | No |
Wind power generated in Madagascar | r=-0.95 | 12yrs | No |
Average number of comments on Extra History YouTube videos | r=-0.96 | 12yrs | No |
Google searches for 'shrek' also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)