Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
Report an error
Google searches for 'google' correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Number of Public Library Members in the UK | r=0.99 | 11yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Sofia | r=0.98 | 19yrs | No |
Number of internet users | r=0.95 | 13yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Parker | r=0.95 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Zoey | r=0.94 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Marshall | r=0.94 | 19yrs | No |
Total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos | r=0.93 | 12yrs | Yes! |
Yogurt consumption | r=0.92 | 18yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Colton | r=0.9 | 19yrs | No |
Warner Bros. Discovery's stock price (WBD) | r=0.87 | 18yrs | Yes! |
Super Bowl TV viewership | r=0.86 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'dumb ways to die' meme | r=0.85 | 18yrs | Yes! |
Number of pirate attacks in Indonesia | r=0.85 | 15yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'doge' meme | r=0.84 | 18yrs | No |
Google searches for 'google' also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)