Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
Report an error
Google searches for 'who is alexa' correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Solar power generated in Senegal | r=0.99 | 15yrs | Yes! |
Solar power generated in India | r=0.98 | 15yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'spiderman pointing' meme | r=0.97 | 17yrs | Yes! |
Solar power generated in Australia | r=0.97 | 15yrs | No |
Hispanic cheese consumption | r=0.96 | 15yrs | No |
The number of logisticians in Idaho | r=0.96 | 16yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Waylon | r=0.96 | 16yrs | No |
The number of statisticians in Vermont | r=0.96 | 16yrs | No |
The number of consultants in New York | r=0.96 | 16yrs | No |
Wind power generated in Kosovo | r=0.94 | 12yrs | Yes! |
Annual US household spending on pork | r=0.93 | 16yrs | No |
The number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in Wyoming | r=0.93 | 14yrs | Yes! |
US Rice Consumption | r=0.83 | 14yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the 'fbi agent' meme | r=0.75 | 17yrs | No |
Krispy Kreme Doughnuts store count in the US | r=0.66 | 15yrs | No |
The number of computer programmers in Wisconsin | r=-0.93 | 16yrs | No |
Google searches for 'who is alexa' also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)