Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
Report an error
Google searches for '3Blue1Brown' correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Engineering technologies | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
The number of cooks, institution and cafeteria in Illinois | r=0.97 | 16yrs | No |
The number of marketing managers in Maine | r=0.96 | 16yrs | No |
US average dairy skim-solid content of cottage cheese | r=0.96 | 15yrs | No |
Wind power generated in Namibia | r=0.96 | 15yrs | No |
Wind power generated in Luxembourg | r=0.95 | 15yrs | No |
Sysco's stock price (SYY) | r=0.95 | 17yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'this is fine' meme | r=0.95 | 17yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'spiderman pointing' meme | r=0.94 | 17yrs | No |
Renewable energy production in Cote d'Ivoire | r=0.94 | 15yrs | Yes! |
Air pollution in Billings, Montana | r=0.94 | 16yrs | Yes! |
Total NBA League Revenue | r=0.92 | 16yrs | No |
Average SAT score in critical reading | r=0.91 | 16yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme | r=0.81 | 17yrs | No |
The number of hazardous materials removal workers in Kansas | r=0.79 | 16yrs | Yes! |
The number of electrical engineers in Arizona | r=0.7 | 16yrs | No |
Google searches for '3Blue1Brown' also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)