Report an error
The number of college sociology teachers in Tennessee correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for Democratic Senators in Tennessee | r=0.92 | 6yrs | No |
How trendy 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are | r=0.9 | 7yrs | No |
How 'hip and with it' 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are | r=0.87 | 7yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Serbia | r=0.76 | 16yrs | Yes! |
Air pollution in Kingsport, Tennessee | r=0.75 | 10yrs | No |
xkcd comics published about hobbies | r=0.7 | 15yrs | Yes! |
Number of edits to the Wikipedia article for Britney Spears | r=0.65 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Maya | r=0.63 | 19yrs | No |
Kerosene used in Kiribati | r=0.52 | 19yrs | No |
The number of college sociology teachers in Tennessee also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)