Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
Report an error
Google searches for 'how do i stop procrastinating' correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for Republican Senators in Idaho | r=0.98 | 6yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in gender studies | r=0.91 | 10yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Business and management | r=0.9 | 11yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in Education | r=0.89 | 10yrs | No |
How nerdy MrBeast's YouTube video titles are | r=0.86 | 12yrs | No |
The number of midwives in Indiana | r=0.86 | 11yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'planking' meme | r=0.81 | 12yrs | No |
How geeky MrBeast's YouTube video titles are | r=0.81 | 12yrs | No |
Number of edits to the Wikipedia article for spurious relationship | r=0.75 | 19yrs | No |
The number of furniture finishers in Missouri | r=0.74 | 19yrs | No |
How 'hip and with it' Tom Scott's YouTube video titles are | r=0.73 | 15yrs | No |
Pirate attacks globally | r=0.7 | 14yrs | No |
Number of times a donut appears in a Garfield comic strip | r=0.67 | 12yrs | No |
Kerosene used in Angola | r=0.62 | 18yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'what does the fox say' meme | r=0.62 | 11yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how do i stop procrastinating' also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)