Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
Report an error
Google searches for 'do vaccines work' correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Solar power generated in Hungary | r=0.97 | 14yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Argentina | r=0.96 | 18yrs | Yes! |
The number of marriage therapists in Illinois | r=0.96 | 19yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Sweden | r=0.96 | 18yrs | No |
Average length of Mark Rober YouTube videos | r=0.96 | 13yrs | No |
Wind power generated in Norway | r=0.96 | 18yrs | No |
The number of traffic technicians in North Carolina | r=0.95 | 19yrs | No |
The marriage rate in Montana | r=0.95 | 18yrs | No |
Google's Net Income | r=0.93 | 19yrs | No |
Number of internet users | r=0.91 | 13yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Niko | r=0.9 | 19yrs | No |
The number of actuaries in Texas | r=0.9 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Stevie | r=0.89 | 19yrs | No |
The number of statisticians in Vermont | r=0.89 | 19yrs | No |
The number of statisticians in New Mexico | r=0.89 | 17yrs | Yes! |
Netflix's stock price (NFLX) | r=0.88 | 20yrs | No |
The Walt Disney Company's stock price (DIS) | r=0.87 | 20yrs | No |
Align Technology's stock price (ALGN) | r=0.86 | 20yrs | No |
Google searches for 'do vaccines work' also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)