Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
Report an error
Google searches for 'buy a house' correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Master's degrees awarded in Military technologies | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Belgium | r=0.98 | 18yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
Air quality in New York City | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Malcolm | r=0.97 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Hugh | r=0.97 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Ira | r=0.97 | 19yrs | No |
Wind power generated in China | r=0.96 | 18yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Willow | r=0.96 | 19yrs | No |
The number of Breweries in the United States | r=0.95 | 19yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on fresh fruits | r=0.95 | 19yrs | No |
The number of industrial engineers in Alabama | r=0.95 | 19yrs | No |
Butter consumption | r=0.94 | 18yrs | No |
The Walt Disney Company's stock price (DIS) | r=0.94 | 20yrs | No |
USA Population | r=0.93 | 19yrs | No |
Average number of comments on MrBeast's YouTube videos | r=0.92 | 12yrs | No |
Automotive recalls issued by Ford Motor Company | r=0.89 | 19yrs | No |
Google searches for 'buy a house' also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)