Report an error
Average viewer count per season of "How I Met Your Mother" correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Stevie | r=0.91 | 9yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Ireland | r=0.89 | 6yrs | No |
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Mozambique | r=0.88 | 9yrs | No |
The number of flight attendants in New York | r=0.87 | 9yrs | No |
Google searches for 'is pluto a planet' | r=0.85 | 9yrs | No |
Points allowed by the Tennessee Titans | r=0.85 | 9yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Aspen | r=0.83 | 9yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Hong Kong | r=0.77 | 9yrs | No |
The average number of likes on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos | r=0.77 | 8yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'loss' meme | r=0.75 | 8yrs | No |
Google searches for 'funny cat videos' | r=0.74 | 9yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'kermit' meme | r=0.74 | 9yrs | No |
Chipotle Mexican Grill's stock price (CMG) | r=0.73 | 8yrs | No |
Google searches for 'yeet' | r=0.72 | 9yrs | No |
xkcd comics published about artificial intelligence | r=0.63 | 8yrs | No |
The distance between Mars and Earth | r=-0.51 | 9yrs | No |
The distance between Venus and the Sun | r=-0.73 | 9yrs | No |
Rain in Phoenix | r=-0.87 | 9yrs | No |
Average viewer count per season of "How I Met Your Mother" also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)