Report an error
The number of accountants and auditors in South Carolina correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Food spending in South Carolina | r=0.91 | 18yrs | No |
Total NBA League Revenue | r=0.89 | 20yrs | No |
Customer satisfaction with AT&T | r=0.89 | 18yrs | No |
Total Revenue of the NFL Teams | r=0.88 | 18yrs | No |
US production of sour cream | r=0.87 | 19yrs | No |
Number of Lawyers in the United States | r=0.87 | 20yrs | No |
The number of accountants and auditors in South Carolina also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)