Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
Report an error
Google searches for 'male pattern baldness' correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| The average number of likes on The Game Theorists YouTube videos | r=0.96 | 15yrs | No |
| Solar power generated in Romania | r=0.95 | 13yrs | No |
| Associates degrees awarded in Theology | r=0.92 | 11yrs | No |
| Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 | r=0.91 | 12yrs | No |
| Divorce rates in the United Kingdom | r=0.91 | 9yrs | No |
| Global Rice Consumption | r=0.89 | 14yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Margaret | r=0.86 | 19yrs | No |
| Popularity of the 'this is fine' meme | r=0.86 | 18yrs | No |
| How provocative The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are | r=0.85 | 15yrs | No |
| The number of actors in Utah | r=0.84 | 16yrs | No |
| Popularity of the 'drake' meme | r=0.82 | 18yrs | No |
| Popularity of the 'minions' meme | r=0.81 | 18yrs | No |
| The number of costume attendants in Minnesota | r=0.8 | 17yrs | Yes! |
| Average viewer count per season of "How I Met Your Mother" | r=0.72 | 9yrs | No |
Google searches for 'male pattern baldness' also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)