Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
Report an error
Google searches for 'boujee' correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Geothermal power generated in Thailand | r=1 | 6yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'fidget spinner' meme | r=0.99 | 7yrs | No |
Average length of MrBeast's YouTube videos | r=0.99 | 8yrs | No |
Jet fuel used in Eswatini | r=0.99 | 6yrs | No |
Total comments on 3Blue1Brown YouTube videos | r=0.96 | 8yrs | Yes! |
Number of edits to the Wikipedia article for Cognitive dissonance | r=0.94 | 8yrs | No |
Robberies in New Mexico | r=0.93 | 7yrs | No |
Air pollution in Lewiston, Maine | r=0.92 | 8yrs | No |
The number of anthropology and archeology teachers in North Carolina | r=0.91 | 7yrs | No |
Rain in Berlin | r=0.91 | 7yrs | No |
Air pollution in Bend, Oregon | r=0.87 | 8yrs | No |
The number of movies Orlando Bloom appeared in | r=0.87 | 8yrs | No |
The number of movies Keanu Reeves appeared in | r=0.86 | 8yrs | No |
The number of movies Michael Cera appeared in | r=0.86 | 8yrs | No |
Google searches for 'boujee' also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)