Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
Report an error
Google searches for 'no cap' correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of veterinarians in New Hampshire | r=0.99 | 19yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Switzerland | r=0.97 | 18yrs | No |
Grocery store spend in South Carolina | r=0.96 | 17yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Social sciences | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
Biomass power generated in Japan | r=0.96 | 18yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Australia | r=0.95 | 18yrs | No |
The average number of likes on Tom Scott's YouTube videos | r=0.95 | 15yrs | Yes! |
The number of mechanical engineers in North Carolina | r=0.93 | 19yrs | No |
Boeing's stock price (BA) | r=0.92 | 20yrs | No |
The number of forensic science technicians in Georgia | r=0.85 | 18yrs | Yes! |
The number of fashion designers in Washington | r=0.82 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'surprised pikachu' meme | r=0.76 | 18yrs | No |
Season wins for the Kansas City Chiefs | r=0.69 | 20yrs | No |
Google searches for 'no cap' also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)